<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Cheap Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefrugalista.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefrugalista.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/</link>
	<description>The frugal side of fabulous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Levitte</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrugalista.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Levitte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugalistabook.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Katy, I am the founder of the site Natalie is mentioning here and I just wanted to lay your suspicions to rest. The ads on our site are there to generate revenue but we are never influenced by advertisers when we make a recommendation. Our writers have strict ethical guidelines they must follow and our editors make sure those guidelines are not ignored. Also, if you look closely at the reviews, they are 2000-3000 words each so there is definitely more content than ads.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katy, I am the founder of the site Natalie is mentioning here and I just wanted to lay your suspicions to rest. The ads on our site are there to generate revenue but we are never influenced by advertisers when we make a recommendation. Our writers have strict ethical guidelines they must follow and our editors make sure those guidelines are not ignored. Also, if you look closely at the reviews, they are 2000-3000 words each so there is definitely more content than ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy Wolk-Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrugalista.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Wolk-Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugalistabook.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>The site is highly suspect, as it has more ads than content. Having said that, I wouldn&#039;t throw it out of bed for eating crackers. And a spot on the blogroll would probably send me some new readers.
Katy Wolk-Stanley
&quot;Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is highly suspect, as it has more ads than content. Having said that, I wouldn&#8217;t throw it out of bed for eating crackers. And a spot on the blogroll would probably send me some new readers.<br />
Katy Wolk-Stanley<br />
&#8220;Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khristal</title>
		<link>http://www.thefrugalista.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Khristal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frugalistabook.com/2009/10/review-of-cheap-products/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with it... as long as the quality is good and it looks good...You can be both you just have to choose wisely...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with it&#8230; as long as the quality is good and it looks good&#8230;You can be both you just have to choose wisely&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

